Tennis to padel conversion: compare space, cost and court yield
A court conversion can raise booking capacity, but the usable footprint, build scope and local demand determine whether the extra courts pay back.
Pair club-management records with payment hardware and a disciplined invoice routine, while checking the gaps before you commit to a stack.
A busy club can take payment in several places: at the front desk, online during booking, or when a player buys a membership, lesson or item from the pro shop. The finance problem is not just accepting each payment. It is connecting the sale to a record, matching settlement to the bank, and getting the right invoice to the customer.
A workable stack has three parts: club-management software to record activity, a payment terminal or online gateway to collect money, and an invoicing process that ends with reconciled records. Playgeko covers some of that operating layer. It offers POS, accepts payments online and at the desk, and provides payout tracking, revenue reconciliation and invoice generation in its dashboard. The exact payment hardware and gateway options are not specified in its published product information, so clubs should confirm compatibility before buying or migrating.
List the transactions your front desk handles in a typical week. Include court bookings paid at arrival, walk-in purchases, memberships, day passes and coaching sessions. Mark which are collected online and which require a staff member to take payment in person. Then note what information staff need to capture for each sale, such as the customer, item or service, amount and whether an invoice is required.
This small audit prevents a common mistake: choosing a terminal first and discovering that its transaction records do not fit the club’s booking and accounting routines. Ask the payment provider and Playgeko what devices and gateway arrangements are supported, what transaction data is recorded, and how refunds and chargebacks appear. Get the answers in writing. Do not assume that a terminal can connect to a club platform just because both handle payments.
Playgeko’s published plans also make feature access relevant to the choice. POS is listed under Professional, rather than Standard. Professional is $76 per month when billed annually and covers up to five branches, 10 courts and four staff seats. Clubs comparing tiers should account for the POS requirement alongside capacity; the feature boundary can matter as much as the court limit.
At checkout, staff need a consistent routine. Record the sale in the club’s operating system, take payment through an approved route, and issue the customer’s receipt or invoice according to club policy. For online bookings, make sure the booking record and the payment record can be checked together. If a sale cannot be matched cleanly, assign someone to resolve it rather than leaving it for month-end.
Then treat settlement as a second step. The amount processed at the desk is not necessarily the amount deposited in the bank on the same day. Fees, refunds, settlement timing and disputes can create differences. Reconcile the payout records against the bank deposit and the day’s sales; investigate the difference instead of forcing the totals to match. Playgeko says its dashboard can track payouts and reconcile revenue, but clubs should confirm which details are available for their own payment setup.
A useful daily close is simple: count or verify the day’s transactions, note cash and card totals separately where applicable, record refunds, and flag any terminal or gateway exceptions. A weekly review can then compare payout records with bank activity. This catches missing settlements sooner than a monthly spreadsheet review.
Invoice generation is only one step in the process. Decide which sales require an invoice, who checks customer and tax details, who sends it, and where the final record is stored. For example, a club might require an invoice for a corporate booking or a customer who requests one, while a standard point-of-sale purchase follows the club’s usual receipt process. Set the rule before staff begin improvising at the desk.
Playgeko lists invoice generation in its dashboard. Its published information does not specify automatic invoice triggers, accounting-system connections, or the tax fields supported. Treat those as questions to verify, not features to assume. If the club needs a separate accounting package or automated transfer of invoice data, confirm whether a supported integration exists for the chosen plan. API integrations are listed under Custom, but that alone does not establish compatibility with a particular accounting tool.
Where no direct automation is confirmed, use a named owner and a recurring close task: review invoice requests, generate outstanding invoices, check numbering and customer details, and pass records to the bookkeeper. This is less seamless than a verified integration, but it is safer than relying on an untested export or duplicate data entry with no owner.
Run a small pilot across the front desk and online checkout. Test a normal sale, a refund, an invoice request and a payout reconciliation. Check that staff can find the relevant transaction later and that the bank settlement can be explained. Record every manual step and every exception. If a transaction has to be entered twice, identify which record is authoritative and who resolves mismatches.
The trade-off is straightforward. A connected setup can reduce repeated work, but only when the club verifies the devices, gateway and data flow it actually uses. A more manual process takes staff time, yet can be dependable when responsibilities and close procedures are explicit. For most operators, the first improvement is not another tool. It is a clear trail from sale, to settlement, to invoice.
A court conversion can raise booking capacity, but the usable footprint, build scope and local demand determine whether the extra courts pay back.
Playgeko’s published tiers make the upgrade decision about more than capacity: coaching, tournaments, CRM and POS begin at Professional.
Map staff duties to permissions before assigning access, so each branch can run its daily work without giving every user club-wide control.